| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
184703
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
109658
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As energy issues are at the top of the policy agenda worldwide, policy-makers increasingly need better decision-supporting processes to assist them in fostering a sustainable energy future. This paper reflects on the interpretation of sustainable development, and links these reflections with the theory and practice of impact assessment applied on energy issues. An analysis of existing impact assessment approaches with regard to their contribution to sustainable development leads to a set of principles for 'sustainability assessment'. Through a study of a participatory impact assessment supporting the development of a radioactive waste management plan in Belgium, the interpretational limits of sustainable development in a nuclear energy context are discussed. This paper sheds light on the complex context in which impact assessment exercises must contribute to sustainable energy development, with a focus on the nuclear energy-(un)sustainability nexus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
175249
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Radioactive waste management is a demanding problem that is raising tensions and misunderstanding amongst the general public, experts, and policy makers in a number of countries. An investigation into the public opinion, legal framework, policy, and expert involvement on the matter of radioactive waste management has been performed in Croatia. The analysis is based on the 2016 national public opinion survey on nuclear energy and radioactive waste, and intensive examination of the changes made in Croatian legislation on radioactive waste management in the last few years. The results of the analysis indicate that hasty political decisions accompanied by a poor information sharing process and an initial low level of public knowledge on radioactive waste in general, leads to strong tensions among stakeholders. It was also shown that the role of experts and the scientific community is not clearly defined resulting in a contradictory public position towards experts and scientists, declaring them as the most trustworthy on one hand, but ignoring their expertise on the other hand. The findings of the conducted research, although specific for Croatia, could be applied in other countries to avoid similar mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|