| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
113594
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
174238
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Revisiting the US-led counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan, we examine to what extent the concepts of legitimacy of the Taliban and the US counterinsurgents showed congruence with pre-existing Afghan notions of legitimacy. We move beyond dominant approaches of social contract theory and materialist legitimacy by using a threefold model of legitimacy to assess the different concepts of legitimacy. Both the Taliban and the US, we argue, diverged markedly from historically developed notions of legitimate rule. The article demonstrates that counterinsurgents need to be aware of and adapt to local norms. Moreover, we point towards relevant norms in the case of Afghanistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
109771
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Does Pakistan figure in the face-saving deal that the US is trying to thrash out with the Taliban in Doha?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
110676
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
051326
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Lahore, Vanguard, 2003.
|
| Description |
viii, 168p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9694023777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 048259 | 958.1046/COR 048259 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
113500
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
127662
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
For the past fifty years, academics and politicians have been discussing the problem of Pashtun domination in the political life and state structures of Afghanistan. From the very beginning (the Afghan state appeared in 1747), supreme power belonged to members of several Pashtun clans, not counting the two brief periods when ethnic Tajiks filled the highest post: Habibullah Khan Kalakani in 1929 and Burhanuddin Rabbani in 1992-2002.
Until 1973, when Afghanistan ceased to be a monarchy, members of the Pashtun political elite ruled the country as emirs and kings; Pashtuns resided at the very top of the pyramid of power. They owed their exalted position to the prevailing opinion that Pashtuns created the state of Ahmad Shah Durrani.
This is true: the main Pashtun tribal groups and unions set up the Afghan state and remained the pillar of its rulers; their fighting force and military skills were the main factors that added strength to the power of the emir (king) and the key elements of the armed forces of Afghanistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|