| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
115617
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
128891
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
111164
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
150837
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
128912
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
144997
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Vij Books India Pvt Ltd, 2016.
|
| Description |
294p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789385563294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058651 | 327.54051/DEE 058651 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
155023
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Basanta K Sahu and Soumya Surabhi discuss India’s participation in and the likely effects of some mega-regional trade agreements with a focus on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Based on in-depth analysis, they highlight some major impacts of the evolving trade agreements and offer time bound roadmaps for India to benefit from them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
111549
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Revolving around the concept of 'Community' or 'community', debate on an Asian region has ostensibly pitted those who proposed an entity limited to East Asia (China, Japan, South Korea and the ten countries of the Association of South East Asian Nations, ASEAN) against those who proposed a much wider region embracing India, North (and, perhaps, South) America, as well as Australasia. Previously these two conceptualisations possessed their eponymous translation in the East Asian Economic Caucus (reincarnated as ASEAN+3) and the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. However, with the creation in 2005 of the East Asian Summit to include India, Australia and New Zealand and, above all, its 2011 enlargement to include the United States and Russia, the contrast between the two conceptualisations of an Asian region has become confused. In order to explain this development, this article suggests that the language of 'region' or 'community' is a discursive smokescreen disguising changes in approaches to multilateralism. An examination of the East Asia Summit, contrasting it with another recent regional project, the Trans Pacific Partnership, suggests that the actors involved are seeking to ensure the primacy of individual nation states in intergovernmental multilateral relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
114701
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, a massive multilateral trade agreement now in the works that focuses on the Asia-Pacific region, could add billions of dollars to the U.S. economy and solidify Washington's commitment to the Pacific. But if the Obama administration fails to calm critics of the deal, there is a growing possibility that it could collapse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
111165
|
|
|