Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1809
Hits:19232007
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
SINGLE - MEMBER DISTRICTS
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
111506
Do voters reward rebellion? the electoral accountability of MPs
/ Vivyan, Nick; Wagner, Markus
Vivyan, Nick
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2012.
Summary/Abstract
To hold their Members of Parliament individually accountable for their legislative behaviour, British voters would need to base their decision to vote for an MP at least partially on the extent to which the MP's legislative voting behaviour deviated from that of the MP's party leadership. Voters should evaluate this deviation contingent on their views of the party leadership. MP rebellion can signal that voter-MP congruence is greater than that of the voter and the MP's party leadership. In this article it is found that only constituents with negative attitudes toward the Labour government reward rebellious Labour MPs, albeit to a limited extent. A similar conditional association is not observed on a single issue: Iraq. The policy accountability of MPs is relatively weak and general rather than issue-specific.
Key Words
Accountability
;
British Politics
;
Legislative Behaviour
;
Voting Behaviour
;
Single - Member Districts
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
126130
Examining biases in the single-member district Tier of Taiwan's
/ Jou, Willy
Jou, Willy
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2013.
Summary/Abstract
Two elections to the Legislative Yuan have been held under a mixed parallel system. While there have been criticisms that this new set of rules leads to a considerable disparity between parties' vote and seat shares in the district tier, in so far as the new electoral system has been accepted and therefore treated as given by both parties and voters, its fairness should be assessed not by the degree of proportionality, but rather by examining various sources of potential bias. These include differences in electorate sizes and turnout rates across districts, and the efficiency by which votes for the main parties' candidates are distributed. The present study investigates how "fair" the functioning of Taiwan s new mixed parallel system was in the 2008 and 2012 legislative elections by simulating equal and reverse vote scenarios at the district level, and measuring the magnitude of each component of electoral bias. The results show that the operation of the electoral system entails no marked partisan bias, since it does not consistently confer an advantage to either of the main parties or camps.
Key Words
Electoral System
;
Legislative Elections
;
Single - Member Districts
;
Partisan Bias
;
Mixed Parallel System
In Basket
Export