Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:662Hits:20133011Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
NORTH VIETNAMESE (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   112147


Soviet biscuit factories and Chinese financial grants: north Vietnam's economic diplomacy in 1967 and 1968 / Mehta, Harish C   Journal Article
Mehta, Harish C Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The author revises existing historical accounts of a critical period during the Vietnam War when the North Vietnamese urgently needed economic aid from their Communist allies in order to prepare for the ambitious Tet Offensive in January 1968, and to help the DRV economy survive President Lyndon B. Johnson's bombardment of North Vietnam under Operation Rolling Thunder. Using new evidence from the archives in Hanoi, this article shows that China-not the Soviet Union-was the biggest donor of economic aid to the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV, or North Vietnam) in 1967 and 1968. The new evidence suggests that American intelligence estimates of Communist bloc economic aid to the DRV were incorrect. Misled by inaccurate data, U.S. officials failed to understand the remarkable resilience of the DRV economy to survive U.S. bombardment. An accurate understanding of Communist bloc aid arrangements might have strengthened the arguments of those American officials advocating early peace negotiations with the DRV.
        Export Export
2
ID:   123039


Spring ex machina: catalytic warfare, Iraq syndrome and the Arab Spring / Orr, Allan   Journal Article
Orr, Allan Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract You have a row of dominos set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go very quickly. So you could have a beginning of a disintegration that would have the most profound influences. Dwight D. Eisenhower For too long, we have lived with the "Vietnam Syndrome." Much of that syndrome has been created by the North Vietnamese aggressors who now threaten the peaceful people of Thailand. Over and over they told us for nearly 10 years that we were the aggressors bent on imperialistic conquests. They had a plan. It was to win in the field of propaganda here in America what they could not win on the field of battle in Vietnam. As the years dragged on, we were told that peace would come if we would simply stop interfering and go home. It is time we recognized that ours was, in truth, a noble cause. A small country newly free from colonial rule sought our help in establishing self-rule and the means of self-defense against a totalitarian neighbor bent on conquest. We dishonor the memory of 50,000 young Americans who died in that cause when we give way to feelings of guilt as if we were doing something shameful, and we have been shabby in our treatment of those who returned. They fought as well and as bravely as any Americans have ever fought in any war. They deserve our gratitude, our respect, and our continuing concern. There is a lesson for all of us in Vietnam. If we are forced to fight, we must have the means and the determination to prevail or we will not have what it takes to secure the peace. And while we are at it, let us tell those who fought in that war that we will never again ask young men to fight and possibly die in a war our government is afraid to let them win.
Key Words Iraq  Thailand  Vietnam - History  America  Six Day War  Arab Spring 
North Vietnamese  Catalytic Warfare 
        Export Export
3
ID:   168617


Use of intelligence by insurgent groups: the North Vietnamese in the Second Indochina War as a case study / Strachan-Morris, David   Journal Article
Strachan-Morris, David Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The need to define intelligence is understandable because the secrecy surrounding it can almost make it appear too amorphous to study. In most definitions, the authors not only attempt to define what intelligence is but also who does it. Until recently the focus has been on the state with occasional focus on sub-state actors such as law enforcement agencies. After 9/11 there was a shift from the study of inter-state intelligence to the use of intelligence against non-state actors such as Al Qaeda. The literature still treated these non-state actors as something to be acted upon rather than intelligence actors in their own right. By examining the North Vietnamese use of intelligence during the Second Indochina War this article takes a step to redress that oversight. This article will discuss the North Vietnamese use of intelligence in the context of definitions of intelligence and intelligence actors and will use John Gentry’s proposed model of violent non-state actor intelligence as its analytical framework.
        Export Export