| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
112189
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The main objective of this article is to highlight the challenge of maritime security in the region geographically bounded by the Indian Ocean. It studies the current status of maritime security in the region from both the traditional and non-traditional points of view. From the traditional security perspective, it examines the strategic interests of the major Indian Ocean players-the China-India competition and India-US relations in particular-in addition to the existing maritime disputes among the littoral states. The non-traditional security angle includes sea lines of communication (SLOCs), piracy, maritime terrorism, natural disasters and other crimes with a maritime dimension. There is a convergence of interests between both the littoral and user states for charting a maritime security cooperation mechanism which envisages a sharing of responsibilities in order to achieve the short-term and long-term maritime security of the Indian Ocean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
189914
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxon, Routledge, 2020.
|
| Description |
xiii, 218p.pbk
|
| Series |
Routledge Research in Polar Law
|
| Standard Number |
9780367492731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060342 | 341.4/HON 060342 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
149533
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The release of the Arbitral Tribunal’s award on 12 July 2016 brought to an end the arbitration case on the South China Sea which the Philippines had unilaterally brought against China in January 2013. This thoroughly one-sided award ruled that many of China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea were contrary to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and had thereby violated Philippine sovereign rights and freedoms. The ruling does not mean that the dispute between the Philippines and China is over. But it does have political and legal implications for China, especially its future approach to managing and eventually resolving the country’s maritime disputes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|