Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
122369
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The profound transformations occurring in the global economy are inevitably causing disruption, confusion and tensions. The proposal for the establishment of a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the U.S. and the EU might seriously exacerbate the situation and lead to the establishment of rival economic blocs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
123630
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Unlike many other social sciences, international relations (IR) spend relatively little time assessing the impact of the nineteenth century on its principal subject matter. As a result, the discipline fails to understand the ways in which a dramatic reconfiguration of power during the "long nineteenth century" served to recast core features of international order. This article examines the extent of this lacuna and establishes the ways in which processes of industrialization, rational state-building, and ideologies of progress served to destabilize existing forms of order and promote novel institutional formations. The changing character of organized violence is used to illustrate these changes. The article concludes by examining how IR could be rearticulated around a more pronounced engagement with "the global transformation."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
123369
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This articles emanates from the observation that realms like theory and broad comparison have typically focused on Western concerns and geography while actors such as China and Turkey have been relegated to the undervalued field of areas studies. Noting that this inhibits our ability to uncover important cross-regional comparisons, the author suggests that "former empires/rising powers" (FERPs) across (Eur)Asia are a promising unit of analysis. To make the case for the FERPs, the author embeds four cases - Turkey, Iran, Russia, and China - in a common problematique, showing that their encounter with Western hegemony/modernity engendered three waves of confrontation vis-Ã -vis the legacies of empire. These confrontations entailed Eurocentric denial as well as Occidentalist reification of native pasts, both of which are being superseded by what the author calls "authenticist" histories empowered by the crystallization of multiple modernities. The author then develops a theoretical framework to capture how reinvented pasts serve as sources of identity, normativity, and action. This approach enables an in-depth account of the Turkish case to show that both official and market actors claim continuity with an Ottoman-Islamic heritage from which a homegrown humanism is said to emanate. These narratives - and the tools through which they are promoted from the cultural industries to public diplomacy - may be helping Turkey and other erstwhile (Eur)Asian empires recalibrate national identity and international purpose at a time of global transformation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
123631
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
137288
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
GLOBAL TRANSFORMATIONS of the last few decades have affected, to a great extent, international space: globalization which added mobility to global population and vagueness to national borders; information technologies and transport infrastructure which are developing by leaps and bounds, etc. are changing the nature of human contacts and the relationships between transnational companies, organizations and states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
113129
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
THIS SPECIAL issue of The National Interest is particularly timely because we are living in a world that we know and that has shaped our thinking, but that world is in a process of transformation. We are struggling with institutions and practices of an Old World when that Old World is fading. This issue explores this global transformation, and I commend to you the articles contained here under the rubric of the "Crisis of the Old Order."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|