Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
102291
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
162060
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
034737
|
|
|
Publication |
London, WeidenFeld and Nicolson, 1973.
|
Description |
320p.
|
Standard Number |
0297765817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
012696 | 355.0335/MAR 012696 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
047975
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Knowledge world, 2000.
|
Description |
xiii, 266p.
|
Standard Number |
8186019286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
043464 | 355.03305/SIN 043464 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
043465 | 355.03305/SIN 043465 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
118484
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
130287
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
058249
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
164289
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
What were Russia’s objectives in Eastern Ukraine, and why was it seemingly unable to achieve a successful or decisive outcome? In contrast to Russia’s seizure of Crimea, the uprising in Eastern Ukraine was marked by disorganization and chaos. Using proxy and surrogate actors, along with military exercises and the injection of Russian troops, Russia sought to institutionalize a political entity inside Ukraine to influence its domestic politics. In this article, I analyze the mechanisms by which Russia attempted to implement, and later salvage, its strategy. The article contributes to clearer theoretical and practical understanding of limited force in coercive diplomacy, signaling, and a more rigorous treatment of the role and uses of proxy actors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
080676
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In response to the perceived inability of the Indian military to leverage its conventional superiority to end Pakistan's "proxy war" in Kashmir, the Indian Army announced a new offensive doctrine in 2004 intended to allow it to mobilize quickly and undertake limited retaliatory attacks on its neighbor, without crossing Pakistan's nuclear threshold. This Cold Start doctrine marks a break with the fundamentally defensive military doctrines that India has employed since gaining independence in 1947. Requiring combined arms operating jointly with the Indian Air Force, Cold Start represents a significant advance in India's conventional military capabilities. Yet, despite the Indian Army's intentions, it risks provoking or escalating a crisis on the subcontinent that could breach the nuclear threshold. Recent military exercises and associated organizational changes indicate that although the Indian Army has made progress toward developing an operational Cold Start capability, particularly in the area of network-centric warfare, the doctrine remains in the experimental stage. Nevertheless, this is a development that deserves further study. As the Indian Army enhances its ability to achieve a quick military decision against Pakistan, the political pressure to employ such a strategy in a crisis will increase-with potentially catastrophic results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
128130
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In the wake of the Kargil War, India developed a limited war doctrine. The key elements of this doctrine are that is a proactive and offensive. It is proactive in the sense that while being strategically reactive, for instance to terror provocation emanating from Pakistan, it is proactive at the operational level in choosing the time and place of conventional response and shaping of the battle. It is offensive in terms of its intent of taking the battle to the enemy, fighting on and making gains on enemy territory and its aim plus of punishing the Pakistan military.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
060809
|
|
|
Publication |
New York, Praeger, 1981.
|
Description |
xii, 495p.
|
Standard Number |
0030593468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
021239 | 355.02/O'B 021239 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
150856
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
119127
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
017618
|
|
|
Publication |
2000.
|
Description |
1205-1220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
025684
|
|
|
Publication |
Lanham, University Press of America, 1984.
|
Description |
v.10 (121p.)
|
Series |
American values projected abroad; v. 10
|
Standard Number |
0819137006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
025991 | 355.43/HAL 025991 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
079392
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Routledge, 2007.
|
Description |
xvi, 170p.
|
Standard Number |
9780415770644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
052607 | 172.420973/BRI 052607 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
181281
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, KW Publishers Pvt Ltd, 2022.
|
Description |
xiii, 362p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9789391490928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
060076 | 327.117/SUB 060076 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
110000
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The author uses formal logic to establish the relationship between the military conflict and war concepts and makes the conclusion that military conflict is a generic term from which war is derived as a type. In a broad sense, war is, therefore, a variety of military conflict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
104627
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
058333
|
|
|