Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1350Hits:18860481Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   113352


Altruism but not Quite: the genesis of the least developed country (ldc) category / Fialho, Djalita   Journal Article
Fialho, Djalita Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract This article provides a historical account of the creation of the ldc category in 1971, analyses the motives of the main actors and examines the motivation of the UN to establish the category. A literature review, official document analysis and expert interviews indicate that, from the perspective of both developed and more advanced developing countries, the initial ldc identification process aimed to generate a reduced list of mostly small and economically and politically less significant countries. Contrary to the official narrative, this served the interests of both developed countries (by undermining the UN's implicit effort to normalise/depoliticise international assistance) and more advanced developing countries (disturbed by the discrimination created within the developing countries' group, favouring the most disadvantaged among them).
        Export Export
2
ID:   132740


Korean bilateral official development assistance to Africa unde / Yoon, Mi Yung; Moon, Chungshik   Journal Article
Yoon, Mi Yung Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract In the past several years, the Republic of Korea-a former least developed country (LDC) and aid recipient that became a donor-joined the "club of emerging donors" to Africa. In March 2006, President Roh Moohyun declared Korea's Initiative for Africa's Development. The initiative puts poverty reduction and socioeconomic development of African countries in the forefront. Using pooled cross-sectional time series data, in this study we examine the determinants of Korean bilateral official development assistance (ODA) to Africa for the period 1991-2011. The findings of the study suggest that the approach of Korean ODA does not differ significantly from that of many conventional donors whose ODA disbursement has had a dual purpose: to improve the welfare of developing countries and to serve self-interests.
        Export Export