Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:589Hits:20604922Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
THOMAS, BRINDA A (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   113451


Edison revisited: should we use DC circuits for lighting in commercial buildings? / Thomas, Brinda A; Azevedo, Ines L; Morgan, Granger   Journal Article
Thomas, Brinda A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract We examine the economic feasibility of using dedicated DC circuits to operate lighting in commercial buildings. We compare light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and fluorescents that are powered by either a central DC power supply or traditional AC grid electricity, with and without solar photovoltaics (PV) and battery back-up. Using DOE performance targets for LEDs and solar PV, we find that by 2012 LEDs have the lowest levelized annualized cost (LAC). If a DC voltage standard were developed, so that each LED fixture's driver could be eliminated, LACs could decrease, on average, by 5% compared to AC LEDs with a driver in each fixture. DC circuits in grid-connected PV-powered LED lighting systems can lower the total unsubsidized capital costs by 4-21% and LACs by 2-21% compared to AC grid-connected PV LEDs. Grid-connected PV LEDs may match the LAC of grid-powered fluorescents by 2013. This outcome depends more on manufacturers' ability to produce LEDs that follow DOE's lamp production cost and efficacy targets, than on reducing power electronics costs for DC building circuits and voltage standardization. Further work is needed to better understand potential safety risks with DC distribution and to remove design, installation, permitting, and regulatory barriers.
        Export Export
2
ID:   128334


Should policy-makers allocate funding to vehicle electrificatio / Thomas, Brinda A; Azevedo, Ines L   Journal Article
Thomas, Brinda A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract In order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States by an order of magnitude, a portfolio of mitigation strategies is needed. Currently, many utilities pursue energy efficiency programs. We study a case where utilities could choose whether to allocate their energy efficiency budget to either end-use efficiency or vehicle electrification as a means to reduce CO2 emissions. We build a decision space that displays the conditions under which utilities should pursue either strategy. To build such decision space, assumptions are needed on how consumers respond to electric vehicle incentives, and what would be the baseline vehicle selected by consumers if no incentives were in place. Since these two aspects are highly uncertain, we treat them parametrically: if consumers are replacing a conventional vehicle with a PHEV, utility incentive programs to induce PHEV adoption appear to be cost-effective for a wide range of efficiency program costs and grid emissions factors.
Key Words Energy Efficiency  PHEV  Cost - Effectiveness 
        Export Export