Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:479Hits:19932332Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
DAVIS, WILLIAM (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   114211


Public opinion–foreign policy paradox in Germany: integrating domestic and international levels of analysis conditionally / Davis, William   Journal Article
Davis, William Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract Does public opinion influence foreign policy? International relations theory is divided on whether foreign policy outputs follow public opinion in advanced democratic countries. Using the case of cold war and post-cold war Germany, I offer an integrated realist theory of the effect of public opinion on foreign policy. I test the theory and the generalizability of the hypothesis of a public opinion-foreign policy nexus using process tracing as well as a time series analysis between the years 1973 and 2002. Using new measures, results here contradict literature on expected public opinion and policy outputs in the cold war period yet are supported after. I find that the predicted effect of public opinion on foreign policy outputs to be confounded by such factors as security threats.
        Export Export
2
ID:   115270


Swords into ploughshares: the effect of pacifist public opinion on foreign policy in Western democracies / Davis, William   Journal Article
Davis, William Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract This analysis focuses on the effects of domestic public pacifist opinion and international security threats on foreign policy outputs. Much work has suggested that governments' foreign policy outputs are responsive to public opinion in advanced democratic countries. Using the cases of several Western democracies, this article offers a theory of the effect of public pacifism on foreign policy. It employs a cross-sectional time-series analysis over a period of a quarter century to test the theory and the generalizability of the hypothesis of an opinion-foreign policy nexus using new measures and broader data. Results here contradict literature on expected public opinion and policy outputs in the Cold War period, yet are supported after. The findings indicate that the predicted effect of public opinion on foreign policy outputs to be conditional on the presence of security threats. Convergence between leaders and public opinion in post-Cold War Western democracies is likely to make hawkish foreign policy less tenable in the West.
        Export Export