Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:828Hits:19859459Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
DIPLOMATIC CONSENSUS (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   114258


Soviet invasion of Afghanistan: international reactions, military intelligence and British diplomacy / Dimitrakis, Panagiotis   Journal Article
Dimitrakis, Panagiotis Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract From the outset the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was strongly condemned by Britain and all the other NATO member states, by the non-aligned group and by key countries in Asia and the Middle East. During the first days following the invasion, London worked for the speedy build-up of a diplomatic consensus, while the Carter administration was still in a state of surprise and some confusion. It is evident that the single factor that led many countries to join forces diplomatically was the fear of further Soviet adventurism in Asia and the Middle East; uninformed, alarmist assessments of Soviet intentions played a major part in cementing a diplomatic coalition, which led to the condemnation of Moscow in the UN General Assembly - predictably, the Soviets had vetoed a Security Council resolution. Simply put, the fear of war led to something of a panic among non-aligned nations, which in turn convinced them to back western diplomacy.
Key Words NATO  Diplomacy  Afghanistan  Middle East  Asia  Britain 
Soviet Invasion  Diplomatic Consensus  Soviet Adventurism 
        Export Export