| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
114645
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article examines recent developments in the East China Sea maritime disputes, focusing primarily on the Principled Consensus agreed on by China and Japan for the joint development of energy resources. The article also provides a perspective on the East China Sea maritime disputes between the two countries within the context of international relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
173426
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
After the tribunal in the South China Sea arbitration found that China is not entitled to claim maritime zones beyond the entitlements that the Law of the Sea provides for, the Philippines and China reentered into negotiations about the joint development of hydrocarbon resources and have come to an understanding on fisheries. Philippine lawyers have criticized these attempts as “waiving” or “compromising” the arbitral tribunal’s award and the Philippines’ claim. This article analyzes the consequences of the award for state obligations under Articles 74(3) and 83(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The article discusses whether and in what way joint development arrangements adopted despite the absence of China’s entitlement to the maritime area in question could prejudice or be factually detrimental to the Philippines’ claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
163788
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As an extremely delicate and sensitive matter, it is unrealistic to expect the eventual
resolution of maritime delimitation disputes in the South China Sea (SCS) in the
immediate future. To manage the disputes and utilize the disputed maritime area,
the claimants in this region have made continued efforts to conclude provisional
arrangements. Due to the lack of consensus on the precise disputed zones and the
low political will to make concessions, the existing arrangements have several
drawbacks. To break the stalemate, a set of approaches are indispensable. A
reasonable first step might be to develop provisional arrangements in less disputed
maritime areas, especially those areas involving only two states. For areas with
multiple claims or where the claimants have low political will to cooperate, it is
advisable to start with developing arrangements on issues with common interests
and easy to implement. For higher sensitive issues, track two connections might be
employed at first, so as to pave the way for future official cooperation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
140413
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The study analyzes disputes and dispute management in the South China Sea. The progress made is outlined through an overview and analysis of formally settled disputes. The unsettled disputes are identified, analyzed, and assessed. The study concludes with a broader assessment from the perspective of dispute management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|