| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
031999
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxford, Martin Robertson and Co. Ltd, 1982.
|
| Description |
x, 219p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
0855203366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 021109 | 923.2/PAR 021109 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
115199
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
One of the largest contemporary debates in political theory revolves around the question of how pluralists can justify their political commitments. Isaiah Berlin, one of the first to face this problem, was a self-proclaimed liberal, whose political writings have led to controversy. In this essay, I take up the issue of how Berlin's use of the essay genre contributes to his defense of liberalism given his pluralist beliefs. I argue that while his reliance upon the essay generates particular interpretive problems, it need not undermine his commitment to liberalism. Rather, Berlin's defense of liberalism involves a rhetorical attempt to discredit alternatives to liberalism while drawing attention to suggestive ties between history, political judgment, and liberalism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|