| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
119432
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The political changes occurring since the end of the Cold War have led to a rethinking of the structures and procedures of national intelligence systems. Policies of openness and interaction regarding these systems' external elements are becoming increasingly important. At the same time, business, non-profit, and governmental organizations in general have become aware of the need to manage relationships with their stakeholders if they want to succeed in accomplishing their missions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
116383
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Most intelligence establishments today speak about transformation and about choices among alternatives to improve efficiency, tackle new challenges to national and international security, and offer the best products to their customers. Such plans generally entail a large variety of reforms, ranging from changes in institutional architecture to the enhanced use of new technologies or new managerial tools for improving communication and interaction within the intelligence organizations. Thus, the same overall or strategic concerns trigger a variety of reforms in the different intelligence organizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
122915
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The massive amount of scientific and popular literature in the emerging field of "theory of intelligence" published over the past decades has been dedicated to analyzing the effects of intelligence organizations and their products in the political decisionmaking process. Different facets of the phenomenon are covered by using various analytical vehicles since a thorough analysis of its perplexities requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes expertise not only in political science but in sociology, psychology, history, and organizational and business management studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
153074
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Intelligence organizations acquire, evaluate, assess, and disseminate information to support national security and foreign policy decision-making. It is part of a government’s efforts to get as close to complete information as possible about both the operating environment as well as other actors. The methodologies employed by intelligence analysts are similar to yet different from those used in many other academic disciplines and professional fields. This discussion about methodology – a form of comparative applied epistemology – can be used to better understand intelligence analysis as a function of government and improve the performance of intelligence analysts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|