| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
116406
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper elucidates patterns of cooperation over the past three decades between some Islamic and secular organizations in Turkey's human rights movement. This paper argues the human rights master frame provided the building blocks for activists to build bridges among ideologically disparate organizations. As a result, a process of reconciliation blossomed in the mid-1990s during a tumultuous period of unprecedented opportunities and severe repression. In addition to the human rights master frame, which formed an ideational bridge across distinct agendas, organizational leaders served as brokers, battling a culture of mistrust and intolerance through confidence-building measures. Although movement activists have made great strides in reconciling differences, two issues-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual rights and external funding-pose new challenges to cross-cleavage partnerships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
146777
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article explores women's rights activism in Turkey during the Justice and Development Party's (AKP) time in power (2002–present). A comparative analysis of three feminist campaigns for policy reform shows that in a context in which majority public opinion and the policy preferences of the ruling party militate against feminist policy proposals, a strong political ally (the European Union) was necessary to generate a policy change. The article also argues that the political opportunity structures within which feminists are embedded have been reconfigured over the course of the AKP's three terms in power, leaving the AKP in a stronger position to resist feminists’ demands. This explains the paradox of an internally stronger and more dynamic social movement that, nevertheless, appears to have weakened vis-à-vis the state. Furthermore, because some recent legal reforms do not significantly reflect the AKP's or much of the public's preferences, the movement has been less able to generate implementation of recent policy changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|