| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
140002
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972.
|
| Description |
x, 150p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0130460036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 010535 | 808.53/EIS 010535 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
160054
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Despite the Realist’s assertion that nothing fundamental changes in world politics, change is the norm in all life and all fields. World politics is no exception. Yes, there are continuities in world politics; they are the persistent, albeit themselves changing, mechanisms that foster fundamental change, the both large and small alterations in the nature of agents, structures, processes, and the content of arguments. Sometimes things change slowly, they evolve. And sometimes radical changes occur in a relatively short period of time; we might think of the latter as phase changes or radical ruptures at tipping points. But often those ruptures have been preceded by decades of slower work by advocates of change toiling in civil societies or specialized communities. Thus, a great deal of effort goes into not only making change but also resisting change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
117574
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
To answer the question posed by the title of this article, we sketch what we mean by the concepts of civility and argument and engagement; note the ways in which the rise of partisan media menaces civil engaged argument; and close with analysis of an exchange between a prominent Democrat and Republican that illustrates the importance of common definitions and sources of trusted evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|