Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:805Hits:19878126Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BURLAND, DANIEL (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   183832


Contractors in Iraq: Exploited Class or Exclusive Club? / Swed, Ori; Burland, Daniel   Journal Article
Burland, Daniel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Corporate privatization of security has generated a neoliberal iteration of an old profession: the private military contractor. This development has revolutionized security policies across the globe while reviving old patterns of inequality. Following neoliberal logic, outsourcing fosters two types of employment: the exploitative and the exclusive. The first refers to low-status individuals hired en masse to perform menial labor; the second refers to experts who perform functions central to the employer’s mission. We contribute to this discussion by focusing on the qualifications of a different subsample of this industry: American contractors who died while performing military and security functions in Iraq. We assert that such American employees directly engaged in mission-essential combat and security functions better fit the employment category of an exclusive, expert sector at the core of the private military industry.
        Export Export
2
ID:   117622


Dynamic lives and static institutions of the two armies: data from the survey of active duty personnel / Burland, Daniel; Lundquist, Jennifer Hickes   Journal Article
Burland, Daniel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The U.S. Army consists of two distinct functional components: soldiers serving in combat roles, on the one hand, and those who serve in support positions, on the other. Do these two functionally distinct segments differ culturally as well? Empirical researchers utilizing qualitative methods have supported a "Two Armies" concept. This article examines the phenomenon quantitatively by using a nationally representative sample of the active duty population. The authors find that there is a statistically significant difference between support and combat soldiers that holds even after taking into account differing demography. Interestingly, this is true mainly of White soldiers, and the authors find that it is driven by premilitary, civilian socialization. This dataset also clearly shows that, for most soldiers, the split between the two segments of the Army tends to diminish over time, with combat and support soldiers sharing more similar motivations with one another later in their terms of service.
        Export Export