| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
019922
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Sept/Oct 2001.
|
| Description |
120-135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
053955
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
133182
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, various gas pipeline projects have been proposed to diversify transit routes and export markets of the landlocked Central Asian states. To evaluate the pipeline project's impact on the players' bargaining power, I apply the cooperate game theory to a quantitative model of the Eurasian gas trade and quantify the bargaining power structure via the Shapley value. Due to ample production capacities in Central Asia, I observe little strategic interaction between the West and China. Thus, demand competition with China is not necessarily a disadvantage for the West, and the Turkmenistan-China pipeline does not affect the impact of the westbound projects aiming Europe and Turkey. For Turkmenistan, i.e., the main supplier in the region, a link via the Caspian Sea to Turkey is the most beneficial westbound option. Although the projects carrying gas from Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan to Europe enjoy the European Commission's political support, they yield marginal benefits to the European consumers. Thanks to its transit position, Turkey collects a large share of the benefits in the East-West gas trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
098974
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
180162
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Natural gas plays an important role in the global energy system. Thus, optimizing trade in natural gas is a key concern for many countries. This study investigates the value of expanding the Gulf Cooperation Council's (GCC) natural gas grid. We consider the documented successes and failures of the regional gas trade in Europe and Asia and weigh them against a GCC case study. The case study uses a partial equilibrium model of energy production, trade and demand calibrated to 2018 conditions to assess regional pipeline gas trade opportunities. The model incorporates parameters that are relevant to energy policy issues, including fuel allocation and energy price reforms. We also incorporate the regional liquified natural gas (LNG) trade strategy of Qatar, a regional and global leader in LNG production and exports. We find that pipeline gas trade cooperation in the GCC can contribute up to $3.1 billion to the regional economy by reducing transportation costs. More accessible gas offers a substitute for liquid fuel consumption and can offset the opportunity costs of using domestic oil to meet domestic energy demands. We also investigate the influence of an integrated gas market and price reforms on the power trade along the GCC interconnector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
077796
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Though North Korea agreed to partial denuclearization in February 2007, achieving that goal is at best a long way off. A natural gas pipeline linking all of Northeast Asia and promising energy and economic help could help convince the isolated nation to step away from its nuclear programs entirely; it could also provide the nonproliferation and energy security benefits that have eluded the region for so long. These economic benefits could motivate the other nations involved in the six-party talks to deal with North Korea more than if only nuclear reactors were offered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
082385
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Although Northeast Asia typically is seen as an arena for conflict over energy supplies, complementary economic relationships would seem to make the region ripe for energy cooperation: Russia possesses major oil and gas resources, while China, Japan, South and North Korea all depend on imported energy. The four papers in this issue raise a number of important and, at times, neglected issues about the prospects for energy cooperation in Northeast Asia. While focusing on specific projects for energy supply and conservation, the authors implicitly raise broader theoretical questions about the prospects for and consequences of regional energy cooperation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
107974
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
065570
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
096387
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As part of the ongoing work by the Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession (CSWP), we offer an empirical analysis of the pipeline problem in academia. The image of a pipeline is a commonly advanced explanation for persistent discrimination that suggests that gender inequality will decline once there are sufficient numbers of qualified women in the hiring pool. The CSWP believes that it is important to ask whether this phenomenon is actually occurring, because the implication is that we can explain inequality as a function of insufficient numbers of trained women in the pool, rather than as a result of ongoing discrimination that requires alternate remedies. Data from the American Association of University Professors suggests that merely increasing the pool of qualified women has not led to a commensurate number of women rising to the top in academia. Women are still ending up in lower paid jobs, and they continue to earn less than men in comparable positions. More aggressive policies to end discrimination are required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
093288
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Warsaw, Polish Institute of International Affairs, 2009.
|
| Description |
229p.
|
| Standard Number |
9788389607584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054626 | 333.790947/WYC 054626 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
099475
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
093935
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
130782
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
020961
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 2000-01.
|
| Description |
36-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
089332
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The development of new energy export infrastructure, which bypasses Russia, has constituted a fundamental element of US and European engagement with the Caucasus in recent years, but has, to some extent, undermined Moscow's hegemony in an area that it considers to be its own 'strategic backyard'. This article examines the validity of the argument that Russian military intervention in Georgia in August 2008 was motivated by so-called 'petro-politics' and a desire to punish Tbilisi for its overt pro-Western orientation. It analyses the significance of the pipelines that transit Georgia and their implications for European energy security, together with the potential consequences of the 2008 conflict for future infrastructure developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
018358
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Fall 2000.
|
| Description |
1-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
115073
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
120962
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper analyzes the potential risks of the Russia-North Korea-South Korea (RNS) gas pipeline, comparing it with the Russia-Ukraine-Europe (RUE) pipeline. I argue that the possibility of disputes is much higher in the RNS case. Furthermore, I propose that the South Korean government opt to import liquefied natural gas by ship directly from Russia if contingency plans in the case of gas supply disruptions in the RNS pipeline are not available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
019455
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
133-152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|