Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1570
Hits:19736474
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
PEARSE, REBECCA
(3)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
118018
Back to the land? legitimation, carbon offsets and Australia's
/ Pearse, Rebecca
Pearse, Rebecca
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2013.
Summary/Abstract
Carbon offsets produced from terrestrial (land-based) emissions reduction projects are a contested frontier of carbon market expansion. Experiments in legislating for and producing terrestrial offsets that come under the title REDD+ have met heated opposition. However, a political consensus about the desirability and feasibility of carbon offsets from avoided deforestation and various land-management practices has slowly emerged. How do terrestrial carbon offsets gain legitimacy in the face of contestation and compelling evidence that creating carbon commodities from land ecosystems is an elusive commodity fiction? It seems that a quiet compromise is emerging over the (re-)commodification of land through carbon trading vis-à-vis the broader process of legitimating marketized climate policy. This paper offers a political-economic analysis of state-led efforts to legitimate a market for land carbon sinks in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. The dynamics of legitimation and contestation play out as an iterative 'double movement'.
Key Words
Australia
;
Asia Pacific
;
Legitimation
;
Emissions Trading
;
Carbon Offsets
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
149932
Coal question that emissions trading has not answered
/ Pearse, Rebecca
Pearse, Rebecca
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Can emissions trading assist with the task of placing a limit on coal production and consumption in Australia? This paper outlines a critical political economy perspective on coal and a flagship ‘market mechanism’ for emissions reduction. The prospects for an effective emissions trading scheme in coal-dominated economies are considered in light of its theoretical justifications as well as recent attempts to price carbon in Australia. Emissions trading is a weak instrument that does not address real-world failures of coal governance. At their theoretical best, carbon prices produce marginal changes to the cost structure of production. In practice, the Australian case demonstrates emissions trading is an attempt to displace the emissions reduction task away from coal, through compensation arrangements and offsetting. In light of the urgent need to rapidly reduce global emissions, direct regulation and democratisation of coal production and consumption should be flagship climate policy.
Key Words
Australia
;
Emissions Trading
;
Coal Governance
In Basket
Export
3
ID:
149917
Coal, climate and development: comparative perspectives
/ Goodman, James; Marshall, Jonathan Paul ; Pearse, Rebecca
Goodman, James
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Key Words
Coal
;
Climate and Development
;
Comparative Perspectives
In Basket
Export