| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
186415
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
We investigate the transmission of natural gas shocks to electricity prices under different scenarios of electricity generation for 21 European markets, from January 1, 2015 to March 11, 2022, proposing indicators of market vulnerability based on the quantile slopes of the regressions of electricity on natural gas and the distance between the transmission effects at very high and low quantiles of the electricity price distribution. We determine that the level of market integration is the main factor underlying national differentiation. Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Germany are the most vulnerable markets to natural gas price shocks under distress. Our results highlight a source of vulnerability that only emerges during market distress scenarios for countries with a small, but non-zero, proportion of natural gas in domestic generation mixes under marginal cost-based electricity pricing. Further market integration is proposed to increase resilience in European electricity markets, based on a different set of regressions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
138388
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India faces a situation of energy crises. Though a short term solution can be to increase its imports, in the long run India has to chart out a new roadmap which includes revamping its current energy structure and including clean energy sources. This has the potential in sifting towards a low carbon growth while simultaneously addressing environmental concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
118103
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
193721
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The European energy crisis in 2021 and 2022 emphasized the importance of energy flexibility to mitigate price peaks and manage increased market volatility. Dynamic electricity tariffs are key to unlocking the potential of energy flexibility, as they incentivize flexible consumers to reduce their costs by shifting their load to periods of low prices. We quantify the potential of dynamic tariffs and focus on their economic and ecological potential particularly in energy crises. Using German Day-Ahead spot market data covering 2019 to 2022 as basis for a dynamic tariff, we determine the cost and emission spread between non-flexible and flexible industrial processes. Our results show that energy flexibility together with the real-time electricity tariff lead to energy cost reductions, with relative cost reductions of flexible loads being up to 12 times higher in the energy crisis. Moreover, pre-crisis electricity costs and associated emissions were highly positively correlated, implying flexibilities in real-time electricity tariffs may minimize electricity costs while simultaneously reducing emissions. Based on our results, we conclude that real-time electricity pricing provides a suitable instrument to (1) incentivize necessary investments in energy flexibility, especially in energy crises, and (2) facilitate flexible consumers to reduce costs and emissions at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|