| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
001271
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1998.
|
| Description |
xx,247p.
|
| Standard Number |
1555876161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 040808 | 337.7291073/KAP 040808 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
030209
|
|
Arab oil weapon
/ Paust, Jordon J; Blaustein, Albert P; Higgins, Adele
|
1977
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dobbs Ferry, Oceana Publications, 1977.
|
| Description |
vii, 370p.
|
| Standard Number |
0379007975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 018000 | 338.272820956/PAU 018000 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
122066
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
International human rights NGOs utilize soft power resources to shape discourse on state compliance with the Laws of Armed Conflict (LOAC), as well as related policy decisions. The NGO impact is generally due to perceived expertise, credibility and commitment to universal principles. This article examines these factors in the NGO campaign in the UK calling for an arms embargo against Israel. NGO reports and activities created the basis for the July 2009 decision by the British government to cancel five military export licences. However, as shown, these reports contain problematic methodologies, inaccurate claims, and controversial interpretations of international law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
091762
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article examines the process of establishing a multilateral strategic partnership between the People's Republic of China and the European Union and gets to the heart of the main problems that stand in the way of Beijing and Brussels drawing closer in the future. The author concludes that resolving existing issues would be conducive to rapid completion of the negotiations on a new comprehensive agreement would, along with the creation of conditions favorable to the development of bilateral relations in the 21st century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
126729
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The 1967 war had more influence on the Arab-Israeli conflict than any other factor, and yet the Arab states did not make use of their most efficient weapon. Most of the research on the Six Day War which has touched on the oil embargo blames the embargo's failure on the lack of Arab unity rather than on the inability to set oil policies. Indeed, many researchers believe that the disagreements within the Arab world before the war prevented the oil-producing states from cooperating with their counterparts, such Egypt and Syria, that took part in the war against Israel, and that the embargo therefore did not stand a chance of succeeding. This article seeks to refute the received wisdom that the 1967 oil embargo was a failure because of the lack of Arab unity. By contrast, the success of the 1973 oil embargo was not, as is widely argued, due to Arab unity but to the nature of the oil market at the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|