Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
006795
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Lancer Publichers, 1996.
|
Description |
x, 203p.
|
Standard Number |
18978292248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
038641 | 355.02/KAM 038641 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
131415
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The outbreak of the First World War remains a great historical puzzle and a source of concern, for if we do not understand how it came about we run the risk of stumbling into a similar catastrophe. This article draws parallels between the world of 1914 and the present. It starts with comfortable assumptions made by so many, then and now, that a major conflict was impossible or improbable and then looks at the paradox that globalization not only made the world more interdependent and linked, but also fostered intense local and national identities. It suggests factors that propelled Europe to war in 1914, including national rivalries, imperialism, the arms race and a shifting power balance between rising and declining powers, as well as ideologies and assumptions such as Social Darwinism and militarism, and points out that similar forces and ideas are present today. The article also stresses the dangerous complacency that can arise as a result of decision-makers having successfully dealt with a series of crises. European decision-makers also assumed that they could successfully use war as an instrument of policy and largely ignored or explained away the mounting evidence that the advantage in conflict was swinging to the defence. Again, as the author points out, there are disquieting parallels with the present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
143483
|
|
|
Publication |
Washington, DC, United Nations General Assembly, 1974.
|
Description |
44p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
013210 | 359.00954/UNI 013210 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
094147
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
053915
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
005056
|
|
|
Publication |
Aldershot, Dartmouth Pub., 1992.
|
Description |
vii, 390p.; figures and tables
|
Standard Number |
1855212218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
036227 | 303.69/CHA 036227 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
002360
|
|
|
Publication |
Cambridge, Union of Concerned Scientists, 1983.
|
Description |
44p.,figures, tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
025009 | 623.44/ANT 025009 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
062717
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
017799
|
|
|
Publication |
Oct 2000.
|
Description |
580-603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
002433
|
|
|
Publication |
Ottawa, Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security, 1991.
|
Description |
64p.
|
Series |
Canadian Institute for International Peace and security working paper; 39
|
Standard Number |
0-662-19329-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
033527 | 327.174/RIO 033527 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
001273
|
|
|
Publication |
Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1998.
|
Description |
xiii,325p.
|
Standard Number |
1-555-87-596-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
040807 | 327.1/BUZ 040807 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
185323
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
034123
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Deep and Deep Publications, 1982.
|
Description |
348p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
020793 | 327.174/BIL 020793 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
050277
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
072644
|
|
|
Publication |
2006.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The hostility between India and Pakistan is believed to have led to an arms race between the two countries, which might have contributed to their retarded economic growth. This paper investigates this twin problem of arms race and economic growth for the time period 1949-2003. The empirical results suggest that there is a mutual causal relationship between the military expenditures of India and Pakistan. Even though military expenditure does not Granger cause economic growth in Pakistan, there is causality from military expenditure to economic growth in India. A VAR analysis revealed that military expenditure hinders economic growth in India in the long-run, but it has a growth promoting effect in the short-run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
025242
|
|
|
Publication |
London, macmillan Press, 1984.
|
Description |
xvi, 291p.
|
Standard Number |
033337648X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
024642 | 355.825119/ROT 024642 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
061655
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Macmillan, 1984.
|
Description |
xxiv, 291p.
|
Standard Number |
033376498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
024467 | 355.825119/ROT 024467 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
083235
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Two NATO allies, Greece and Turkey, have also been considered potential threats to each other. Thus, these countries' military spending has been subject to many academic studies to observe if these potential threats trigger the military spending of both countries. Nonetheless, most regression results of those studies did not find a significant result supporting the arms race between the two countries. The current study provides an additional empirical evaluation of military spending of both countries by using an annual data set running from 1958 to 2004. The study is in spirit of Smith et al. (2000) employing a Markov switching approach, but utilizing a longer period. A Markov switching approach allows estimation of military spending of each country if both sides compete with each other to have higher spending or if they behave independently of each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
087001
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The ongoing Turkish-Greek antagonism has triggered the interest of defense economists to investigate the various aspects of the arms race between Turkey and Greece. However, empirical studies examining the long-run relationship between the military expenditures of the two countries offer little evidence in favor of such an interaction. This paper attributes the poor results of the previous literature to the adherence to linear cointegration techniques and argues that if the adjustment towards long-run equilibrium is asymmetric, nonlinear co-integration models should be employed. Accordingly, this paper considers threshold autoregressive (TAR) and momentum threshold autoregressive (M-TAR) models as alternative adjustment processes for the cointegration relationship, following Enders and Siklos (2001). The results indicate that the relationship between the variables can be characterized by a threshold cointegration specification following an M-TAR type adjustment process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
094143
|
|
|