| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The US-Republic of Korea (ROK) alliance had significantly developed asset specificities and common social identities attached to it during the cold war period. If institutional features and ideational factors originating from the cold war threat can account for alliance resilience in the post-cold war period, the US-ROK alliance should be a 'most likely case' to support those causal links. This article shows that such is not the case. This article, instead, argues that the US-ROK alliance went beyond being an instrument of threat response to becoming a more complicated mechanism for serving 'general interests' in relation to North-East Asian regional order maintenance and order-building, which drove the US-ROK alliance between 1998 and 2008.
|