Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1480Hits:19741588Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
TRANSFORMING POLITICS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   131989


Ideological construction of the politics of nationalism in Turk: the Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi (MHP), 1965-1980 / Erken, Ali   Journal Article
Erken, Ali Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This article analyzes the ideological evolution of Turkish nationalism in politics from 1965 to 1980 providing an in-depth analysis of the ideological contours of the Cumhuriyetçi Köylü Millet Partisi (CKMP; Republican Peasant Nation Party) and its successor the Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi (MHP; Nationalist Movement Party). It shows that there were different channels for indoctrination promoting their own view of nationalism within the movement. It also aims to demonstrate that a tangible shift in the nationalist discourse of the party took place during this period, concomitant to the change of the agents of political nationalism. This transfer of ideological power was reflected in the party's gradually transforming political discourse, swinging from secular nationalism to the margins of religious-conservative nationalism.
        Export Export
2
ID:   119478


Six models for the internet + politics / Fung, Archon; Gilman, Hollie Russon; Shkabatur, Jennifer   Journal Article
Fung, Archon Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Many agree that digital technologies are transforming politics. They disagree, however, about the significance and character of that transformation. Many of the pioneers of understanding the distinctive dynamics of new digital media platforms-social media and collaborative production-are quite optimistic about the potential for the Internet to dramatically increase the quality of democratic governance. On the other hand, some political scientists who have examined actual patterns of political activity and expression on digital platforms come away skeptical that digital platforms will bring equality or inclusion to democratic politics. We bring these two opposed perspectives in this article by developing six models of how digital technologies might affect democratic politics: the empowered public sphere, displacement of traditional organizations by new digitally self-organized groups, digitally direct democracy, truth-based advocacy, constituent mobilization, and crowd-sourced social monitoring. Reasoning from the character of political incentives and institutional constraints, we argue that the first three revolutionary and transformative models are less likely to occur than the second three models that describe incremental contributions of technology to politics.
        Export Export