|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
154148
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In the last decades, many political theorists have explored the idea of deliberative democracy. The basic claim is that well-functioning democracies combine accountability with a commitment to reflection, information acquisition, multiple perspectives, and reason-giving. Does that claim illuminate actual practices? Much of the time, the executive branch of the United States has combined both democracy and deliberation, not least because it has placed a high premium on reason-giving and the acquisition of necessary information. It has also contained a high degree of internal diversity, encouraging debate and disagreement, not least through the public comment process. These claims are illustrated with concrete, if somewhat stylized, discussions of how the executive branch often operates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
188692
|
|
|
Publication |
India, Allen Lane, 2008.
|
Description |
xiv, 366p.pbk
|
Standard Number |
9780241552100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
060304 | 330.019/THA 060304 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
119655
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Chances are that you will never hear a crowd at a protest rally chant, "What do we need? Regulation! When do we need it? Now!"
People want safe food, clean air, and clean water. But in the abstract, regulation is never a popular idea. In a tough economic environment, it might seem like a recipe for disaster. In the United States, businesses large and small have long argued that they are subject to excessive red tape and government oversight, and in the context of a serious recession, that concern has become acute. In light of the country's general enthusiasm for freedom of choice, regulation is particularly vulnerable to political attack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|