| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article outlines two positions in the ongoing discussion in the sociology of the military regarding the horizontal cohesion of battle groups, the vertical esprit de corps and the influence of both on task efficiency. The two concepts are reached through two different ways of observation - an empiricist field study approach and a rationalist survey approach. Field study data generated through direct observations whereas survey data is generated through indirect observation in which general concepts are used. Central is that the use of different methods, also generate different kinds of data. Such a difference is not merely of theoretical interest but also of vital importance to both the political decision process and the military leadership and management process as they rely on correct intelligence before, during and after operations. This article outlines the discussion between the two positions and then goes on to present an attempt to resolve the discussion between the rationalis and the empiricist position in the sociology of the military by using the theories of Agnes Heller. The central concept to theoretically and practically connect a rationalist and an empirist position is the concept of a vivid present - in this context used as a military vivid present.Its heuristic value is demonstrated through two cases from a field study of Danish KFOR (Kosovo Force).
|