Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1465Hits:19670739Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
DEKUN, HU (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   130613


Are the Diaoyu Islands Japan's inherent territory: a comment on the origins of the Japan-China territorial issue by Murata Tadayoshi / Dekun, Hu; Zilong, Yan   Journal Article
Dekun, Hu Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract "Historians believe that historical essays have nothing to do with the science of history and are actually harmful. Indeed, authors of such essays, whether intentionally or unintentionally, leave traces of themselves and their time. The same is true of editorials and reviews found in today's newspapers." ' The Origins of the Japan-China Territorial Issue, a new book by Mr. Murata Tadayoshi, an honorary professor at Japan' s Yokohama National University is also an example of what the Contemporary Historian, Mr. Chen Yinke, was referring to in the above. It is common knowledge that after Japan's Noda cabinet adopted its "nationalization" policy over the Diaoyu Islands on September ll, 2012, the Sino-Japan relationship began a downward spiral, while rivalry between non-govemment groups from both nations escalated. The Diaoyu Islands dispute has become a hot topic for both the media and academia. Among the many works on the topic, Professor Murata's is quite unusual. While tensions remain high between China and Japan, his book carries an impressive argument as shown by work's subtitle-FaZsz?ed Facts in Japanese Government Papers. The cover of the book also features the question--"Are the Diaoyu Islands an inherent part of Japan's territory?"
        Export Export
2
ID:   120500


San Francisco peace treaty and the disposal of the Japanese ter / Dekun, Hu; Yongli, Han   Journal Article
Dekun, Hu Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract As the San Francisco Peace Treaty has violated the principle of "not making a separate armistice or peace with the enemy" and denied the allies' provisions for the disposal of Japanese territory, it is illegal and invalid, and cannot form the Japanese "legal basis" for their so-called Diaoyu Islands being Japan's "inherent territory."
        Export Export
3
ID:   136335


U.S. neutrality policy on the Diaoyu island dispute / Dekun, Hu; Xiangyun, Huang   Article
Dekun, Hu Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract While the U.S. has never taken the Diaoyu islands as Japan’s territory, it has repeatedly stated that the Diaoyu islands is applicable to the treaty of security and safeguard between Japan and the United States. Therefore the U.S. actually does not keep its neutrality. This shows that the US has not yet abandoned its Cold War mentality, and this is unfair to China and detrimental to China-Japan friendship and to the peace of Asia.
        Export Export