Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:444Hits:20432873Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
ARMSTRONG, CAROLYN (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   121424


Tracking the process of international norm emergence: a comparative analysis of six agendas and emerging migrants' rights / Gest, Justin; Armstrong, Carolyn; Carolan, Elizabeth; Fox, Elliott   Journal Article
Armstrong, Carolyn Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract This article provides a systematic understanding of international norm emergence and illuminates the various strategic pathways to altering global dialogue and standards of practice. It traces the steps leading to global norm emergence and identifies the range of conditions that are necessary or sufficient for potential norms to move from one step to the next. Accordingly, it analyzes the progress of six separate international norm agendas to develop a more systematic understanding of the process of global norm creation, which can be applied to fledgling efforts to establish a new regime of international migrants' rights. Based on this examination, it introduces a typology that categorizes the stages of norm development and the range of possible outcomes.
Key Words Human Rights  Migration  Global Governance  Process Tracing  Norm Emergence  Agenda 
Stages 
        Export Export
2
ID:   120831


Understanding European asylum cooperation under the Schengen/Du: a public goods framework / Thielemann, Eiko; Armstrong, Carolyn   Journal Article
Thielemann, Eiko Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Recent developments in European Union (EU) asylum cooperation raise important questions about the nature of cooperation and the potential problems facing collective action in the realm of EU internal security. The emergence and the subsequent stability of the Schengen/Dublin system is especially puzzling, given the highly inequitable distribution of costs and benefits that this system entails among the participating states and begs the question as to why those states that are likely to face a disproportionate 'burden' under the system would have agreed to it. This article seeks to provide an alternative approach to answering this question by drawing on a public goods framework. We argue that a simple focus on free-riding and exploitation dynamics, as emphasized in the traditional collective action literature, falls short as an explanation and instead demonstrates how more recent theoretical contributions to the public goods literature can offer new insights into the origin and evolution in cooperation in this sensitive policy area.
        Export Export