Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:355Hits:19939375Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
EPSTEIN, KATHERINE C (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   121540


No one can afford to say damn the torpedoes: battle tactics and U.S. naval history before world war I / Epstein, Katherine C   Journal Article
Epstein, Katherine C Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Historians overwhelmingly agree that the U.S. Navy changed dramatically between the early 1880s and World War I, but few have asked how the "New Navy" of this era planned to fight its battles. This article seeks to recover its ideas about battle tactics, using torpedo development as a point of entry. Although officials thought seriously about torpedoes' tactical implications, technological complexity and habits of institutional communication hindered the navy's ability to agree on them, and important questions remained unresolved on the eve of World War I in 1914.
Key Words United States  US Navy  Battle Tactics  World War I 
        Export Export
2
ID:   138349


Scholarship and the ship of state: rethinking the Anglo-American strategic decline analogy / Epstein, Katherine C   Article
Epstein, Katherine C Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article uses the centenary of the First World War as an opportunity to re-examine a major element of the existing literature on the war—the strategic implications of supposed British decline—as well as analogies to the contemporary United States based upon that interpretation of history. It argues that the standard declinist interpretation of British strategy rests to a surprising degree upon the work of the naval historian Arthur Marder, and that Marder's archival research and conceptual framework were weaker than is generally realized. It suggests that more recent work appearing since Marder is stronger and renders the declinist strategic interpretation difficult to maintain. It concludes by considering the implications of this new work for analogies between the United States today and First World War-era Britain, and for the use of history in contemporary policy debates.
        Export Export