Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:365Hits:19890836Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
OPERATION ROLLING THUNDER (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   121545


Breaking the trance: the perils of technological exuberance in the U.S. air force entering Vietnam / Fino, Steven A   Journal Article
Fino, Steven A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract A survey of U.S. Air Force air-to-air armament from World War II through Vietnam's Operation ROLLING THUNDER reveals the institution's focus on developing advanced technologies and tactics designed to thwart hordes of Soviet bombers. Challenged by nimble MiGs over Vietnam, the service was reluctant to investigate "low-tech" armament solutions. When the value of a gun in air combat was finally acknowledged, the Air Force elected to field it as part of an integrated weapons system on the F-4E. In the interim, pilots at DaNang air base cobbled together an inelegant but effective air-to-air external gun system. The episode reveals the significant potential, and fragility, of unit-initiated tactical innovation and the peril that can arise when an organization's technological exuberance obfuscates less technologically-appealing solutions.
        Export Export
2
ID:   180457


Was Airpower “Misapplied” in the Vietnam War? reassessing Signaling in Operation Rolling Thunder / Gurantz, Ron   Journal Article
Gurantz, Ron Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Operation Rolling Thunder’s failure has been widely blamed on the strategy of using force to send “signals.” It discredited the associated theory of coercion among a generation of military officers and scholars. In this paper I show that, whatever its other failures, Operation Rolling Thunder did successfully signal a threat. I rely on the latest research to demonstrate that Hanoi believed the bombing would eventually inflict massive destruction. I also show that Washington accurately ascribed the failure of the threat to North Vietnam’s resolve and continued the operation for reasons other than signaling. These findings show that Operation Rolling Thunder can be productively understood as an exercise in both signaling and countersignaling. Rather than discrediting the theory of coercion, these findings modify it. They show that failed threats can be informative and that coercive campaigns can become prolonged for reasons other than a lack of credibility.
        Export Export