Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:350Hits:19956828Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (IOS) (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   189266


Diplomatic Deliberative Practices in International Organizations: Does Institutional Design Matter? / Panke, Diana; Polat, Gurur; Hohlstein, Franziska   Journal Article
Panke, Diana Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Scholars have demonstrated that deliberation between political actors in states as well as in International Organizations (IOs) matters because it can impact the quality and legitimacy of outcomes. Yet, we do not know much about how deliberation between political actors can be triggered in practice. Drawing on insights from the deliberative turn that has taken place in Comparative Politics as well as insights from International Relations, this paper inquires how different IO institutional features effect the extent of diplomatic deliberation. Unique and novel survey data shows that there is variation between and within IOs. In some IOs, such as the UNFCCC or CoE, diplomats engage in extensive deliberations, while they do so considerably less in others, such as the UNWTO or IWC. Our paper provides novel insights into the inner working of IOs. In general, diplomatic debates are most pronounced in large IOs with high level delegates that often opt for negotiating behind closed doors. In addition, specific institutional design elements matter in the different stages of an IO policy-cycle, such as procedural rules fostering interaction between diplomats in the negotiation stage or a limited policy scope in the voting stage.
        Export Export
2
ID:   122301


Pluto of international organizations: micro-agendas, IO theory, and dismissing the Shanghai Cooperation Organization / Crosston, Matthew   Journal Article
Crosston, Matthew Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract This article investigates the peculiarities of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Unlike many more famous international organizations (IOs), the SCO is dominated by micro-agendas that seem to run counter to most of the theoretical literature applicable to IOs. This analysis examines these internal machinations and divergent interests through the theoretical lens, breathing new relevance into the institutional skepticism of Mearsheimer. Consequently, the SCO should not be considered a legitimate IO as traditionally framed. As such, it might be the "Pluto" of IOs that needs renaming and removal from the classification of IOs.
        Export Export