Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1821Hits:19352120Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   122433


AFSPA – an oxymoron in a democratic polity and a Human Rights issue / Mukhim, Patricia   Journal Article
Mukhim, Patricia Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract The Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) dates back to 1958 when it was passed by the Indian Parliament to quell the Naga rebellion in a so-called disturbed area. Later it was extended to the states of Assam, Manipur, Tripura, parts of Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh and later to Jammu and Kashmir in 1990. This Act is a legacy of a colonial power. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1942, was used by the British to quell dissent during the Second World War. But even before that it was used as an instrument of repression which led to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. It is ironic that a free country would be waging a war against its own people using all forms of brutality to secure the nation-building agenda of the State. Why else would you use the military for an internal rebellion?
        Export Export
2
ID:   189732


Internet shutdowns: a human rights issue / Ryng, Julia   Journal Article
A Human Rights Issue Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The internet is a double-edged sword: civilians can mobilise it to assemble and voice dissent, but illiberal regimes can also weaponise it to consolidate power and suppress any form of opposition. Internet shutdowns – intentional disruptions of internet services – represent one method used to limit citizens’ freedom of expression, information, peaceful assembly and other associated rights in the name of national security. Julia Ryng, Guillemette Guicherd, Judy Al Saman, Priyanka Choudhury and Angharad Kellett examine the cases of Myanmar and Belarus: two distinct political regimes that nonetheless converge on similar strategies of repression. Through this comparative analysis, the authors highlight how future repression is likely to work and how compelling policy responses can be formulated.
        Export Export