| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the relationship between violence and development. It explores whether violence is an intrinsic (structural) part of development, or a contingent result of poor or mistaken policies and practices that might be corrected. The issue of how far an element of violence might be desirable for development is also considered. These two issues are debated in the context of a variety of approaches to development and in light of various accounts of violence offered by analysts such as Fanon, Benjamin, Critchley and Zizek. In conclusion it is argued that an emancipatory conception of development may be reconciled with Benjamin's idea of divine violence in the form of a Badiouan event-with the proviso that the Derridian conception of the economy of violence is also applied in such a way as to minimise, or at least limit violence.
|