Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:822Hits:19982885Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
NEW YORK STATE (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   124085


Comments on Jacobson et al.'s proposal for a wind, water, and s / Gilbraith, Nathaniel; Jaramillo, Paulina; Tong, Fan; Faria, Felipe   Journal Article
Jaramillo, Paulina Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Jacobson et al. (2013) recently published a paper arguing the feasibility of meeting all of the energy demands in New York State with wind, solar, and water resources. In this forum we suggest that the authors do not present sufficient analysis to demonstrate the technical, economic, and social feasibility of their proposed strategy.
        Export Export
2
ID:   186412


Locational value of distributed energy resources: a parcel-level evaluation of solar and wind potential in New York state / Bowen, Thomas   Journal Article
Bowen, Thomas Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Distributed energy resources (DERs) are poised to play a significant role in evolving power systems because of their flexibility to be sited in areas of high value to the grid. Traditional DER compensation frameworks, specifically net energy metering (NEM), inadequately communicate differences in the locational and temporal value of DER generation to the grid. As a transition from NEM, New York State's (NYS's) Value of Distributed Energy Resources (VDER) framework provides a methodology for calculating different value components that DERs offer the grid. To study the impacts of VDER frameworks on DER deployment, we developed a model to assess the value of distributed solar and wind systems configured as either a behind-the-meter system or a front-of-the-meter system for each parcel of land in NYS. Using parcel-level granularity, we can closely evaluate DER locational value and siting availability, particularly in urban and suburban settings. Our analysis finds while most DER generators would be modestly compensated for deferred transmission and distribution infrastructure upgrades (~0.01 $/kWh for solar PV), a subset of projects receive significant value from this component (0.035 to 0.089 $/kWh for top 5% of parcels for solar PV). Finally, our analysis finds VDER provides less overall compensation than NEM to the average DER generator, however, it increases access to compensation for front-of-the-meter DERs – a large and emerging market.
        Export Export