Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2241Hits:19289759Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
POOLING (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   124526


Pool it, share it, or lose it: an economical view on pooling and sharing of European military capabilities / Thomas Overhage   Journal Article
Thomas Overhage Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract In a general and economical view, this article analyzes methods and mechanisms for the pooling and sharing of military forces and weapons inside the European Union (EU) in times of scarcity. Pooling and sharing could improve the EU military capabilities significantly if differences in location factors were taken into account and all states would focus on their respective strengths. More competition and less concentration are the keys to ensuring guaranteed access to military assets. Pooling and sharing are likely to be successful only if large states enhance their emphasis on collective defense by mutual aid and self-help, and reduce particularistic and parochial interests of local gain. The realm of personnel has the most potential for improvement but any change is likely to generate policy implications.
        Export Export
2
ID:   134067


Understanding the social construction of the democratic deficit: a Foucauldian approach / Fanoulis, Evangelos   Journal Article
Fanoulis, Evangelos Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Drawing upon the Foucauldian approach of governmentality, this article argues that the democratic deficit of the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) is the outcome of how governmental power flows in CSDP governance and more precisely within the governance practices of the policy. To support this argument, the narrative explores the secrecy/confidentiality, informality and normalisation of the exercise of governmental power in a concrete example of CSDP governance, the recent pooling and sharing initiative. The example shows that the official makers of CSDP pursue efficiency of governance to the detriment of the democratic quality of the policy, and this is related with the productive and expansive rationality of governmental power flowing in and between the EU institutions. Despite the fact that governmentality usually links to structural explanations, allowing limited space for the role of agency in politics, the article concludes with reflections on how the political agency of the governing EU political subjects contributes to the social construction of the democratic deficit of CSDP.
        Export Export