Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1285Hits:19465793Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GREY AREA (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   145655


“Grey Area” in the Northern Bay of Bengal: a note on a functional cooperative solution / Mishra, Raghavendra   Journal Article
Mishra, Raghavendra Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The judgments in maritime delimitation cases involving Bangladesh and Myanmar (2012) and between Bangladesh and India (2014) have resulted in a “Grey Area” in the northern Bay of Bengal involving intersecting and overlapping rights and responsibilities in terms of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and continental shelf regimes. This article seeks to identify a functional solution for this Grey Area.
        Export Export
2
ID:   139010


Radical criminals in the grey area: a comparative study of Mexican religious drug cartels and Australian outlaw motorcycle gangs / Vergani , Matteo; Collins , Sean   Article
Vergani , Matteo Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article defines and assesses the ideal-type of the radical criminal as the analytical framework for a comparative qualitative study of Mexican religious drug cartels and Australian outlaw motorcycle gangs and concludes that radical criminals operate in both weak and failed states and stable democracies. The article participates in the wider discussion concerning the existence (and the features) of a grey area between criminal and political violence, through the lens of the radical criminal ideal-type.
        Export Export
3
ID:   124568


Tribunal navigating complex waters: implications of the bay of Bengal case / Schofield, Clive; Telesetsky, Anastasia; Lee, Seokwoo   Journal Article
Schofield, Clive Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract The International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea's March 2012 Judgment in the Bay of Bengal Case is a landmark decision in multiple ways. It represents the first maritime boundary to be delimitated by the Tribunal. It is the first adjudication of a maritime boundary in Asia, and it is also the first judicial delimitation of a maritime boundary for parts of the extended continental shelf located seaward of the 200-nautical-mile limit from baselines. While the Tribunal's ruling largely resolves the maritime dispute between Bangladesh and Myanmar, it also raises a number of questions and concerns that are highlighted in this article, including the Tribunal's approach to delimitation both within and beyond the 200-nautical-mile limit, the treatment of islands, the interplay between law of the sea institutions and the creation of a so-called grey area where continental shelf jurisdiction falls to one state and water column jurisdiction to the other.
        Export Export