Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:418
Hits:20328478
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
PRICE, MEGAN
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
125139
First things first: assessing data quality before model quality
/ Gohdes, Anita; Price, Megan
Gohdes, Anita
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2013.
Summary/Abstract
We address weaknesses in the Peace Research Insitute Oslo (PRIO) Battle Deaths Dataset, and as a result draw contradicting conclusions to those presented by Lacina and Gleditsch. Our analysis focuses on the availability of data on battle deaths within specific conflict-years and problems encountered when data from multiple types of sources are combined. We repeat Lacina, Gleditsch, and Russett's analysis of battle deaths over time, with an attempt to provide a more robust model and incorporate an estimate of the uncertainty present in the PRIO Battle Deaths Dataset. This reanalysis reveals that the data used to establish the PRIO Battle Deaths Dataset does not offer a clear answer as to whether battle deaths have decreased or increased since the end of the Second World War. We contend that while the PRIO Battle Deaths Dataset offers the most comprehensive assembly of battle deaths data available to date, it is not suitable for analysis across countries or over time.
Key Words
Peacekeeping
;
Conflicts
;
Europe
;
Norway
;
Selection Bias
;
Battle Deaths
;
Conflict Data
;
International Relations - IR
;
World War -II
;
Peace Research Institute Oslo - PRIO
;
Civil War
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
184767
Norm erosion and Australia's challenge to the rules-based order
/ Price, Megan
Price, Megan
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Australian foreign policy makers increasingly place an emphasis on the importance of rules and norms. These foreign policy statements reflect concerns about China's growing assertiveness combined with the belief that a ‘thick’ anarchy is safer for middle powers. Yet while Australia has been fixated with how China poses a threat to the international order, at times, Australia has actively challenged that order itself. Such was the case when the Prime Minister gave an address on ‘negative globalism’ at the Lowy Institute in October 2019. This article advances a theoretically grounded framework for understanding how these performative challenges arise and come to cause norm erosion. The framework draws together three elements: the rule or norm in question; representational strategies; and domestic audiences. The article illustrates this framework using the example of the Prime Minister's Lowy Institute address.
Key Words
Constructivism
;
Foreign Policy
;
Rules-Based Order
;
Norm Erosion
;
Representational Strategies
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export