Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:489Hits:19915722Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MULTILATERAL TALKS (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   129020


Next phase in the consolidation and expansion of global governa / Thakur, Ramesh; Job, Brian; Serrano, Mónica; Tussie, Diana   Journal Article
Thakur, Ramesh Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract THE KEY INSIGHT EXPRESSED IN THE STRIKING WORDS OF THE BRUNDTLAND Commission-"The Earth is one but the world is not"1-remains as relevant a political statement about most global governance challenges today as it was about sustainable development twenty-seven years ago. Global governance entails multilevel and networked relations and interactions for managing and facilitating linkages across policy levels and domains. It consists of formal and informal arrangements that provide more order and stability for a world in constant and rapid flux than would occur naturally-the range of international cooperation without a world government. Intensifying global interdependence, growing recognition of problems that defy solutions by a single state or organization, and increasing numbers and importance of nonstate actors have all contributed to the growth of global governance as an analytical framework.
        Export Export
2
ID:   162648


Possibility of building a peaceful regime on the korean peninsula via multilateral approaches / Lee, Junghoon   Journal Article
Lee, Junghoon Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Multilateral approaches such as the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, the Four-Party and Six-Party Talks, and the Trilateral Coordination and Oversight Group (established by the USA, Japan, and South Korea to solve North Korea’s issues and to build a peaceful regime on the Korean Peninsula) have achieved few accomplishments since the Cold War. Exceptions include the avoidance of deadly clashes during ongoing multilateral talks at the time of serious situations including the nuclear crisis in 1994 and the Bush administration’s attempt to strike on North Korea with nuclear weapons. The USA has hesitated to conduct kind military relationships with North Korea because they seem to strongly recognize the high risk associated with physical conflict. Additionally, the USA and its allies have experienced North Korea’s ability with nuclear weapons. Many which have attempted to target the USA during the later years of the Clinton and Bush administrations. Dealing with North Korea contributes to the knowledge of those involved in the Six-Party Talks regarding how to work with the USA and others. Are multilateral approaches still efficient under this situation? Even with a number of several types of proposals such as China’s recent dual-track approach or double suspension approach—also backed by Russia—there seems to be no certain attempt to collaborate on building a peaceful regime. This paper will examine why multilateral approaches to building a peaceful regime post Cold War on the Korean Peninsula have forwarded little to a contextual perspective of the changing regional circumstances.
        Export Export
3
ID:   125562


Slow burn: Myanmar's tentative steps towards ceasefire / Jolliffe, Kim   Journal Article
Jolliffe, Kim Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract After 65 years of conflict, Myanmar's government and opposition groups could be close to realizing a nationwide ceasefire, an achievement that would mark a step towards multilateral talks. Kim Jolliffe examines the many hurdles yet to be overcome.
        Export Export