Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:446Hits:20598984Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW VOL: 44 NO 4 (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   124566


Conciliation and the 1982 UN convention on the law of the sea / Yee, Sienho   Journal Article
Yee, Sienho Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Conciliation is an age-old peaceful means of dispute settlement. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea provides for both voluntary and compulsory conciliation. The importance of conciliation under UNCLOS is obvious, yet it has received little focused attention.
        Export Export
2
ID:   124567


Impact of the deepwater horizon: the evolving international legal regime for offshore accidental pollution prevention, preparedness, and response / Vinogradov, Sergei   Journal Article
Vinogradov, Sergei Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract The Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico has ignited unprecedented global attention and debate on and global review of the efficiency and effectiveness of the existing international regimes governing offshore operations; particularly, accidental pollution prevention, preparedness, and response mechanisms. This article looks at these developments.
        Export Export
3
ID:   124568


Tribunal navigating complex waters: implications of the bay of Bengal case / Schofield, Clive; Telesetsky, Anastasia; Lee, Seokwoo   Journal Article
Schofield, Clive Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract The International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea's March 2012 Judgment in the Bay of Bengal Case is a landmark decision in multiple ways. It represents the first maritime boundary to be delimitated by the Tribunal. It is the first adjudication of a maritime boundary in Asia, and it is also the first judicial delimitation of a maritime boundary for parts of the extended continental shelf located seaward of the 200-nautical-mile limit from baselines. While the Tribunal's ruling largely resolves the maritime dispute between Bangladesh and Myanmar, it also raises a number of questions and concerns that are highlighted in this article, including the Tribunal's approach to delimitation both within and beyond the 200-nautical-mile limit, the treatment of islands, the interplay between law of the sea institutions and the creation of a so-called grey area where continental shelf jurisdiction falls to one state and water column jurisdiction to the other.
        Export Export