Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:527Hits:19919179Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BORGIDA, EUGENE (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   126338


Implicit and explicit measurement approaches to research on pol: the case of race-based disparities in criminal justice / Borgida, Eugene; Miller, Andrea   Journal Article
Borgida, Eugene Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract In 2011, more than 3% of all black men in the United States were imprisoned, compared to only 0.5% of all white men. Among prisoners ages 18 to 24, black men were imprisoned at a rate more than seven times that of white men (Carson and Sabol 2012). It is becoming increasingly urgent for researchers to understand what accounts for these race-based disparities. While a broad constellation of social problems exist that likely contribute to these disparities in concert, different fields of social science tend to focus on different types of explanations. Political scientists and sociologists have tended to emphasize the role of institutional factors, including criminal justice policies and practices, in maintaining race-based disparities. Social psychologists, in contrast, have tended to emphasize individual factors, including punitive responses to crime by jurors, judges, and criminal justice professionals.
        Export Export