Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1559Hits:19782468Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MONGOL INVASION (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   033429


Delhi sultanate / Majumdar, R C (ed.) 1967  Book
Najumdar R.C. editor Book
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Edition 2nd edn.
Publication Bombay, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1967.
Description xxxviii, 882p.: ill., mapshbk
Series History and Culture of the Indian people
        Export Export
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession#Call#Current LocationStatusPolicyLocation
015983954.0232/MAJ 015983MainOn ShelfGeneral 
2
ID:   126931


Mongol invasion in Iranian drama: the case of Bahram Beyzaie / Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari, Behrooz; Manavi, Mahsa   Journal Article
Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari, Behrooz Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract New Historicists view history as a text through whose discontinuities and breaks the repressed and suppressed voices find ways of articulation. Likewise, a literary text, in its underlying layers, alludes to the historical conditions at the time of its production. In some cases, as in Bahram Beyzaie's works, however, the author intentionally uses the past to reread the present. He recreates history as a text in which the voices repressed in the classified history are heard. As the Mongols played an important role in the history of Iran, some of Beyzaie's works pay particular attention to them. This paper analyzes some of Beyzaie's plays and screenplays to investigate the presentation of the Mongols in his fictional worlds.
Key Words Iran  Bahram Beyzaie  Mongol Invasion  Iranian Drama  History 
        Export Export
3
ID:   147814


Mongol invasion of south Rus’ in 1239–1240s: controversial and unresolved questions / Maiorov, Alexander V   Journal Article
Maiorov, Alexander V Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The author suggests historical and textual comment to the most important reports of Russian chronicles, including those about the capture of Chernigov, reconciliation of the Russian princes with the Tatars, the coming of Möngke Khan to Kiev, Mikhail Vsevolodovich’s flight from Kiev, the capture of Kiev, Volodymyr Volynskyi, Berestie, and Halych. The significance of the Mongols’ stone artillery in attacking Russian cities is considered. The author compares various reports in Russian chronicles about the date of the capture of Kiev by the Mongols with information from Hungarian sources and concludes that the most trustworthy date must be 6 December 1240. Proper names Uladmur and Uchogul Uladmur given by the medieval Persian historian Rashid-ad-Din in his account of the conquest of South Rus’ by the Mongols cannot, in the opinion of the author, be related to the historical toponyms of Galician-Volhynian Rus’. The Mongol name Uladmur was connected with the name of Prince Vladimir Riurikovich, who had occupied the Kievan throne not long before the attack of the Mongols against South Rus’ and held peaceful negotiations with Prince Möngke. Based on the study of comparative-historical materials, the author concludes that in Volhynia and Galicia the Mongols used a method that they had often used before. They forced the residents of the conquered cities to go outside the city walls and massacred them. They spared only the young men suitable for military service and took them into auxiliary troops (khashar), so that they should fight in the most dangerous areas of the battle.
Key Words Mongol Invasion  South Russia  1239–1240 
        Export Export