Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:870Hits:18545009Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
REGIONAL ASSISTANCE MISSION TO SOLOMON ISLANDS - RAMSI (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   127066


Add women and stir: the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands and Australia's implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 / Westendorf, Jasmine-Kim   Journal Article
Westendorf, Jasmine-Kim Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract With the changing nature of warfare and the increasing awareness of the specific gender dimensions of war and peace, the international legal framework has been expanded to address the particular challenges faced by women in conflict and post-conflict contexts. This process culminated in 2000 with the first United Nations document to explicitly address the role and needs of women in peace processes: United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325 on women, peace and security. Thirteen years on, this article assesses the extent to which Australia's stated commitment to women, peace and security principles at the level of the international norm has translated into meaningful action on the ground in the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI). The analysis shows that despite it being an ideal context for a mission informed by UNSCR 1325, and Australia being strongly committed to the resolution's principles and implementation, the mission did not unfold in a manner that fulfilled Australia's obligations under UNSCR 1325. The RAMSI case highlights the difficulty in getting new security issues afforded adequate attention in the traditional security sphere, suggesting that while an overarching policy framework would be beneficial, it may not address all the challenges inherent in implementing resolutions such as UNSCR 1325
        Export Export
2
ID:   127064


Reputation and responsibility in Australia's 2003 intervention / Halvorson, Dan   Journal Article
Halvorson, Dan Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract This article reinterprets Australia's motives for its 2003 intervention in the Solomon Islands. The central argument is that considerations of Australia's international reputation have not been afforded sufficient importance in explaining the Howard government's decision to intervene. A primary concern for the Howard government was to bolster Australia's reputation in the 'War on Terror' vis-à-vis the USA and the international community more broadly by being seen to maintain order in its regional sphere of responsibility. The article establishes the historical basis for Canberra's claims to a special responsibility for the South-West Pacific region. It then demonstrates the close connection between Australia's responsibility for order in its region and the reputational norms that evolved during the early years of the War on Terror. These claims are substantiated through an analysis of the Solomon Islands crisis from June 2000 until the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands was deployed in July 2003.
        Export Export