| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
173019
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Three and a half years since taking office, the Trump administration has failed to develop, let alone pursue, a coherent nuclear arms control strategy. The administration’s official nuclear policy document, the “2018 Nuclear Posture Review,” barely discusses arms control as a risk reduction tool. It passively states that “the United States will remain receptive to future arms control negotiations if conditions permit.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
189718
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
After more than a decade of deteriorating relations and dithering on disarmament, the three largest nuclear powers—Russia, the United States, and China—are on the verge of an unconstrained era of dangerous nuclear competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
158805
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
020148
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Autumn 2001.
|
| Description |
135-147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
150318
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The most serious test for any U.S. president is reducing global nuclear dangers. For decades, Republican and Democratic leaders have negotiated agreements to limit and cut nuclear arsenals, worked to curb the spread of nuclear weapons, and sought to reduce the risk of miscalculation and catastrophe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
184903
|
|
|