Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
020353
|
|
|
Publication |
Sept 2001.
|
Description |
1-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
127877
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
089909
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
There has been a shift to a deterrent strategic doctrine with an offensive bias. India's strategic doctrine is thus potentially a compellent one. However, cognizance of the need for limitation to conflict in the nuclear age entails identification of the implications of compellence for both conventional and nuclear doctrines. On the conventional plane, the hiatus between pivot corps and strike corps offensives is taken as a key 'exit point' for war termination efforts. At the nuclear level, this article recommends a movement in India's nuclear doctrine from 'massive' punitive retaliation to 'flexible' punitive retaliation. This will bring about a concordance between the two levels - conventional and nuclear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
138803
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
If, as expected, Iran's ongoing nuclearization continues unimpaired, Israel will soon need to make certain basic revisions to its core strategic doctrine. These revisions would be substantially oriented toward enhancing the Jewish State's now-indispensable nuclear deterrence posture. Although largely counter-intuitive, such enhancement would actually require Israel to “disclose,” in carefully calculated increments, certain hitherto “ambiguous” aspects of the country's nuclear forces and infrastructures. In any such unique and unprecedented effort to systematically remove the “bomb from the basement,” major responsibilities for apprising political decisionmakers will fall upon the Israel Intelligence Community (IIC), most plainly MI (Military Intelligence, orAman) and the Israel Defense Force (IDF) Planning Branch. The IIC will need to be concerned with the following strategic doctrinal revisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
137964
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India is a status quoist power. This is easier to establish in terms of its approach to territory. It appears to have reconciled to the fact that some of its territory is occupied by neighbours Pakistan and China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|