Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:894Hits:18919685Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
COUNTERINSURGENCY SUCCESS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   128578


Counterinsurgency force ratio: strategic utility or nominal necessity / Moore, Riley M   Journal Article
Moore, Riley M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract As a consequence of intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan, force ratio for counterinsurgency (COIN) has come under increased scrutiny. Reduced to its essence, the issue is simply, 'How many troops does it take to get the job done?' This answer has been sought by the US military, academia, and think tanks. There have been numerous responses, culminating in several 'plug-and-play' equations for minimum force ratios in COIN operations. Due to the impossibility of determining precisely how many insurgent forces there are, it has become common to base force ratios on the population of the country. In the realm of policy, the question above is posed as, 'How many of our troops does it take to get the job done?
        Export Export
2
ID:   153632


Hearts and minds fallacy: violence, coercion, and success in counterinsurgency warfare / Hazelton, Jacqueline L   Journal Article
Hazelton, Jacqueline L Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Debates over how governments can defeat insurgencies ebb and flow with international events, becoming particularly contentious when the United States encounters problems in its efforts to support a counterinsurgent government. Often the United States confronts these problems as a zero-sum game in which the government and the insurgents compete for popular support and cooperation. The U.S. prescription for success has had two main elements: to support liberalizing, democratizing reforms to reduce popular grievances; and to pursue a military strategy that carefully targets insurgents while avoiding harming civilians. An analysis of contemporaneous documents and interviews with participants in three cases held up as models of the governance approach—Malaya, Dhofar, and El Salvador—shows that counterinsurgency success is the result of a violent process of state building in which elites contest for power, popular interests matter little, and the government benefits from uses of force against civilians.
        Export Export