Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
131999
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
What is China's international identity? How has it changed over time, especially since the reform and opening up of the country in the late 1970s? How does China see itself? And how do other countries see China? I argue that answers to these questions are instrumental to a proper understanding of Chinese foreign-policy behaviour, in ways more significant than we normally assume. To advance this argument, I choose to examine China's social interactions with the outside world to ascertain the evolution of its international identity/identities. I shall trace the domestic sources of China's external policies. In so doing, I hope this article will elucidate the 'debates' between social constructivism and realism as to their relative explanatory power with respect to the making of Chinese international identity. I also hope it will throw light on a possible alternative framework, known as social evolution, for studying China's international relations and its evolving identities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
140436
|
|
|
Edition |
3rd ed.
|
Publication |
Cambridge, Polity Press, 2014.
|
Description |
xiii, 292p.: tables, boxes, abbre.pbk
|
Standard Number |
9780745664705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
058284 | 327.14/SMI 058284 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
137442
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
129565
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This study examines the ways in which Turkey's regional role, power and self-image are constructed by the Turkish official discourse on Syria. Focusing on the speeches of the AKP government on the conflict, as reported in a major mainstream Turkish daily, Milliyet, between March 2011 and November 2012, the article explores the major building blocks of the AKP government's representation of Turkey's capability, responsibility and threat perceptions with regard to the ongoing crisis. The analysis shows that the AKP government's demonization of the Assad regime and depiction of Turkey's moral responsibility toward the Syrian people served to constitute Turkey's great power role and assert Turkey's moral superiority vis-à-vis the other actors in the conflict. Turkey's policy of grandeur has been an integral element of the country's moralist, as well as national security discourse on Syria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
128679
|
|
|