Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
133766
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The Ganges River Treaty, one of the world's successful examples of a peaceful resolution to a long-drawn river water dispute, has completed half of its tenure. This provides an opportunity to evaluate the variables of its success and further understand how both India and Bangladesh are going to deal with emerging challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
053125
|
|
|
Publication |
Apr-Jun 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
053119
|
|
|
Publication |
Apr-Jun 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
022240
|
|
|
Publication |
April 2002.
|
Description |
245-278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
172223
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyses how long-running, multilayered conflicts over water at the Hirakud dam underpin present-day societal divisions in Odisha state. There are four unresolved conflicts over this dam in the state: movements against displacement, movements for rehabilitation, struggles between agricultural and industrial water users, and, finally, disputes between federal states. These have generated societal ruptures from the announcement of the dam in 1946 to the present day. We argue that understanding the confluence and ingrained, overlapping character of these conflicts provide important vantage points for understanding the present uneasy constitution of subregional state fabrication in Odisha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
133913
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The Indus Treaty is stable due to its mechanism it survived after three wars. Now there is demand in Pakistan for the abrogation of the treaty, because it gives upper hand to India. After the 1996 treaty Bangladesh is demanding agreement on Teesta River but it is not easy to sign it. The interests of the West Bengal are important. The ruling party, BJP, wants Mamta Banergee's support in Rajyasabha. Both countries signed more treaties more agreements and MOUs on the Ganges river water sharing. India is not happy with Nepal about water and Hydropower sharing. Tanakpur and Karnali projects were difficult to implement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
067348
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
059313
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
054637
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
133900
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
India is surrounded by many big and small countries and to maintain cooperative, collaborative and peaceful relations with the neighboring countries is an important principle of foreign policy of India. India's centrality in the region needs a balanced and cooperative approach in India's neighborhood policy. The Kashmir problem, dealing with nuclear Pakistan, Sir Creek and Siachen disputes, water conflict, problem of terrorism, Tamil problems, fisherman problem, border problem are various complicated issues which have to be dealt by an effective foreign policy module of the NDA government. The real test of dealing with countries will be judged during the time of crisis. So an effective crisis management structure is necessary for effectively managing crisis situations with the neighboring countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
133898
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
An assessment of the foreign policy balance-sheet of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) administration reveals its ineptitude in resolving the issue of water-sharing of the Teesta River with Bangladesh, the legacy of which has been inherited by its successor, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Government, under the leadership of Narendra Modi, who adorned the Prime Minister's Chair on 26 May 2014. The legacy of this contentious bilateral issue can be traced back to the Second Phase of the UPA administration (UPA-II) in 2011, when the Chief Minister of the Indian state of West Bengal, Mamata Banerjee refused to budge on her decision of not sharing the Teesta river water with Bangladesh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
057831
|
|
|
Publication |
Oct-Dec 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
163145
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2019.
|
Description |
xvii, 270p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9789386618757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059570 | 327.51054/BHU 059570 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
061732
|
|
|
Publication |
Apr-Jun 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
058012
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
053117
|
|
|
Publication |
Jan-March 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
098078
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
128952
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
There are conflicting views as to whether water scarcity will lead to cooperation or conflict. The central thesis of this paper is that conflict over water scarcity only becomes likely when it causes an existential threat to a population or state. The paper identifies a requirement for a new definition of the most severe levels of water scarcity in response to the concept of virtual water and proposes a new definition for absolute water scarcity based upon the presence of an existential threat to a population. Using the principles identified from a review of the water conflict debate and the new definition, the paper examines two Central Asian case studies to gauge the likelihood of conflict. In the case of the Aral Sea it concludes that regional geopolitics, assisted by international organisations should be able to find a compromise. In the case of Kazakhstan's Ili and Irtysh Rivers it takes the view that water scarcity, demographics and geopolitics are likely to cause China to export its insecurity to other nations. In so doing it may cause conflict that should be a concern to the UK and other nations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
157019
|
|
|
Publication |
Oxon, Routledge, 2008.
|
Description |
xxxii, 441p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9781138564732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059268 | 333.91/JOY 059268 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
012039
|
|
|
Publication |
Jan-March 1997.
|
Description |
Series of articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|