| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article analyses eleven cases of constitution-making in eight Southeast Asian countries since 1986. It investigates design choices and actors' interests, the link between the form of the political regime and the extent to which process designs matter for the legitimacy of the constitutional orders in the region. In doing so, the article demonstrate that the link between the form of the political regime and the extent to which constitution making is inclusive or participatory is less clear cut. While we would expect better opportunities for public participation and border inclusion of extra parliamentary actors in constitution-making in democratic environment, the empirical evidence is mixed. If and how this matters for public support for a constitution and the social acceptance for the constitutional order is not clear. In fact, the Southeast Asian experience seems to indicate that procedural legitimacy is less relevant for the acceptance of a constitution than the legitimacy that derives from the day to day plebiscite by citizens and elites.
|