Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1337Hits:19417622Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
VIEIRA, VINÍCIUS RODRIGUES (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   146455


Beyond the market: the global South and the WTO’s normative dimension / Vieira, Vinícius Rodrigues   Journal Article
Vieira, Vinícius Rodrigues Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Negotiators expect the World Trade Organization (WTO) to be an arena for states to pursue their material gain. However, the WTO also reflects symbolic aspects of international politics, in particular the notion of multilateralism. Although such a principle, in part, expresses Western dominance, Global South states have also benefited from multilateral regimes, and thus have incentives to legitimize them and behave according to their rules. Will the pattern of multilateralism change as other trade arrangements potentially gain more prominence? This article analyzes actions taken by Brazil and India in WTO’s Doha Development Agenda (DDA) and concludes that the multilateral system of trade will survive as Global South states participate in the organization to seek not just material gains but also to commit themselves to the international normative dimension.
        Export Export
2
ID:   129576


Public and private: change and continuity in economy through two meta-fields in society / Vieira, Vinícius Rodrigues   Journal Article
Vieira, Vinícius Rodrigues Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract The current literature on comparative political economy does not seem to consider unifying under a single theoretical framework the analysis of continuity and change in different economic systems. On the one hand, major comparative works derive their theoretical propositions from dynamics in the Western world. On the other, studies that are focused on national trajectories of development are concentrated in cross-national comparisons involving countries with similar characteristics in what concerns strategies of development. In this paper, I argue that all fields in the world of social action are pervaded by two major fields, hereby dubbed 'meta-fields': public and private. Both are in a 'double movement' to shape each other's boundaries through the definition of social and property rights that regulate access to human capabilities and capital. Public and private are meta-fields because they constrain human action and the organization of social configurations on state and non-state levels.
        Export Export